[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100317192850.GA2090@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:28:50 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] exit: exit_notify() can trust signal->notify_count < 0
Now that Veaceslav changed copy_signal() to use zalloc(), exit_notify()
can just check notify_count < 0 to ensure the execing sub-threads needs
the notification from us. No need to do other checks, notify_count != 0
must always mean ->group_exit_task != NULL is waiting for us.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/exit.c~1_EXIT_NOTIFY 2010-03-17 19:10:28.000000000 +0100
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/exit.c 2010-03-17 19:17:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -857,12 +857,9 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_stru
tsk->exit_state = signal == DEATH_REAP ? EXIT_DEAD : EXIT_ZOMBIE;
- /* mt-exec, de_thread() is waiting for us */
- if (thread_group_leader(tsk) &&
- tsk->signal->group_exit_task &&
- tsk->signal->notify_count < 0)
+ /* mt-exec, de_thread() is waiting for group leader */
+ if (unlikely(tsk->signal->notify_count < 0))
wake_up_process(tsk->signal->group_exit_task);
-
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
tracehook_report_death(tsk, signal, cookie, group_dead);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists