lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:10:42 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> CC: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project On 03/18/2010 11:54 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I took a quick look at the qemu.git log and more than half of all recent > contributions came from Linux distributors. > I don't know what you're looking at, but in the past month, there's been 56 unique contributors, with 411 changesets. I count 16 people employed by distributions with 188 changesets. > So without KVM Qemu would be a much, much smaller project. It would be similar > to how it was 5 years ago. > I'm not saying that KVM isn't significant. I'm employed to work on QEMU because of KVM. I'm just saying that KVM users aren't 99% of the community and that we can't neglect the rest of the community. Regards, Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists