[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c86c4471003181116i6ea31333tecf79eb487fcad7b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:16:37 +0100
From: stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix stat attach bogus counts
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> When perf stat -p pid is used, the events must be enabled
>> immediately as there is no exec and thus no enable_on_exec.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>>
>> --
>> builtin-stat.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> index 95db31c..3a91fad 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> @@ -159,8 +159,10 @@ static void create_perf_stat_counter(int counter, int pid)
>> }
>> } else {
>> attr->inherit = inherit;
>> - attr->disabled = 1;
>> - attr->enable_on_exec = 1;
>> + if (target_pid == -1) {
>> + attr->disabled = 1;
>> + attr->enable_on_exec = 1;
>> + }
>
> Mind checking latest -tip, which has these commits:
>
> d6d901c: perf events: Change perf parameter --pid to process-wide collection instead of thread-wid
> 46be604: perf record: Enable counters only when kernel is execing subcommand
> 6be2850: perf stat: Enable counters when collecting process-wide or system-wide data
>
> as they fix/improve various --pid related behavioral aspects of perf. Does it
> work fine for you now?
>
They indeed included the same fix.
So that's fine now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists