[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100321184801.GA29085@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:48:01 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Janak Desai <janak@...ibm.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] check_unshare_flags: kill the bogus
CLONE_SIGHAND/sig->count check
check_unshare_flags(CLONE_SIGHAND) adds CLONE_THREAD to *flags_ptr if the
task is multithreaded to ensure unshare_thread() will fail.
Not only this is a bit strange way to return the error, this is absolutely
meaningless. If signal->count > 1 then sighand->count must be also > 1,
and unshare_sighand() will fail anyway.
In fact, all CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM checks inside sys_unshare() do not
look right. Fortunately this code doesn't really work anyway.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/fork.c~UNSHARE_DONT_USE_SIG_COUNT 2010-03-21 18:37:31.000000000 +0100
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/fork.c 2010-03-21 19:08:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -1519,14 +1519,6 @@ static void check_unshare_flags(unsigned
*flags_ptr |= CLONE_SIGHAND;
/*
- * If unsharing signal handlers and the task was created
- * using CLONE_THREAD, then must unshare the thread
- */
- if ((*flags_ptr & CLONE_SIGHAND) &&
- (atomic_read(¤t->signal->count) > 1))
- *flags_ptr |= CLONE_THREAD;
-
- /*
* If unsharing namespace, must also unshare filesystem information.
*/
if (*flags_ptr & CLONE_NEWNS)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists