[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100321135836.GA11661@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:58:36 +0800
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David.Woodhouse@...el.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, eric@...olt.net, ben@...adent.org.uk,
gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-agp.c: Fix crash when accessing nonexistent GTT
entries in i915
On 2010.03.20 14:04:56 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:26 +0100
> > Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Attached dmesg, lspci -vv, config and xorg.
> >>
> >> When the X server crashes, the kernel does not report anything
> >
> > This seems to have gone all quiet?
>
> It seems so, I was about to ping Zhenyu.
Could you try recent X.org intel driver release? Your failure X log
showed some pretty old UMS driver's render flush time out message,
I think whose version never has been well tested with new kms/gem stuff.
>
> >
> > As this was a 2.6.32->2.6.32.4 regression, I assume that it's also a
> > 2.6.32->2.6.33 regression?
>
> Yep. All kernels I tested since 2.6.32.4 crash, including 2.6.32.10,
> 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc1. See my original message for more details about
> the crash.
>
Could you bisect? I doubt it's caused by David's patch, as if it is, you
will have trouble at early agp init time, instead of current problem looks
like something causing rendering hang..and I can't think of how mapping GTT
to a scratch page could cause problem in case GTT bar is truely 256K.
--
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.
$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists