[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca2dc2821003210830h2025df79r477cca7d81ddd28d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:30:20 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David.Woodhouse@...el.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, eric@...olt.net, ben@...adent.org.uk,
gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-agp.c: Fix crash when accessing nonexistent GTT
entries in i915
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 2010.03.20 14:04:56 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Morton
>> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:26 +0100
>> > Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Attached dmesg, lspci -vv, config and xorg.
>> >>
>> >> When the X server crashes, the kernel does not report anything
>> >
>> > This seems to have gone all quiet?
>>
>> It seems so, I was about to ping Zhenyu.
>
> Could you try recent X.org intel driver release? Your failure X log
> showed some pretty old UMS driver's render flush time out message,
> I think whose version never has been well tested with new kms/gem stuff.
>
Sure. Debian Stable got version 2.3.
>>
>> >
>> > As this was a 2.6.32->2.6.32.4 regression, I assume that it's also a
>> > 2.6.32->2.6.33 regression?
>>
>> Yep. All kernels I tested since 2.6.32.4 crash, including 2.6.32.10,
>> 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc1. See my original message for more details about
>> the crash.
>>
>
> Could you bisect? I doubt it's caused by David's patch, as if it is, you
> will have trouble at early agp init time, instead of current problem looks
> like something causing rendering hang..and I can't think of how mapping GTT
> to a scratch page could cause problem in case GTT bar is truely 256K.
I bisected in order to find the commit 5877960869333e42ebeb733e8d9d5630ff96d350.
I don't know if such commit is really the true problem (does not seem
so if you are right); however, it is the commit that breaks the X
server as I stated in the original message.
>
> --
> Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.
>
> $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkumJgwACgkQsQQaM014GCe2cgCbB8LJnqn7n7J++lA8Pd+TfBQb
> 2BQAn2sYv0DZuSniLTcf9F3cX+cGIgVl
> =gQHY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists