[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100323160933.GA4465@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:09:33 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christofferdall@...istofferdall.dk>
Cc: containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [C/R ARM][PATCH 3/3] c/r: ARM implementation of
checkpoint/restart
Quoting Christoffer Dall (christofferdall@...istofferdall.dk):
> Implements architecture specific requirements for checkpoint/restart on
> ARM. The changes touch almost only c/r related code. Most of the work is
> done in arch/arm/checkpoint.c, which implements checkpointing of the CPU
> and necessary fields on the thread_info struct.
>
> The ISA version (given by __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__) is checkpointed and verified
> against the machine architecture on restart. If they differ, an error is
> raised and restart aborted. It should be possible to restart on newer
> architectures, but further investigation is warranted.
>
> Regarding ThumbEE, the thumbee_state field on the thread_info is stored
> in checkpoints when CONFIG_ARM_THUMBEE and 0 is stored otherwise. If
> a value different than 0 is checkpointed and CONFIG_ARM_THUMBEE is not
> set on the restore system, the restore is aborted. Feedback on this
> implementation is very welcome.
>
> We checkpoint whether the system is running with CONFIG_MMU or not and
> require the same configuration for the system on which we restore the
> process. It might be possible to allow something more fine-grained,
> if it's worth the energy. Input on this item is also very welcome,
> specifically from someone who knows the exact meaning of the end_brk
> field.
>
> Added support for syscall sys_checkpoint and sys_restart for ARM:
> __NR_checkpoint 367
> __NR_restart 368
>
>
> Cc: rmk@....linux.org.uk
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christofferdall@...istofferdall.dk>
> Acked-by: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
In terms of the cr api I don't see any problems. Two nits below,
but in any case
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
thanks, this is really cool, especially how minimal it is :)
-serge
...
> +static int load_cpu_regs(struct ckpt_hdr_cpu *h, struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(t);
> +
> + memcpy(regs, &h->uregs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> + regs->uregs[i] = h->uregs[i];
> +
> + /*
> + * Restore only user-writable bits on the CPSR
> + */
> + regs->ARM_cpsr = regs->ARM_cpsr |
> + (h->ARM_cpsr & (PSR_N_BIT | PSR_Z_BIT |
> + PSR_C_BIT | PSR_V_BIT |
> + PSR_V_BIT | PSR_Q_BIT |
> + PSR_E_BIT | PSR_GE_BITS));
> + regs->ARM_ORIG_r0 = h->ARM_ORIG_r0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* read the cpu state and registers for the current task */
> +int restore_cpu(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct ckpt_hdr_cpu *h;
> + struct task_struct *t = current;
> + int ret;
> +
> + h = ckpt_read_obj_type(ctx, sizeof(*h), CKPT_HDR_CPU);
> + if (IS_ERR(h))
> + return PTR_ERR(h);
> +
> + ret = load_cpu_regs(h, t);
will load_cpu_regs() ever be changed to return anything but 0? If
not both fns can be simplified.
...
> +int restore_mm_context(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + struct ckpt_hdr_mm_context *h;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + h = ckpt_read_obj_type(ctx, sizeof(*h), CKPT_HDR_MM_CONTEXT);
> + if (IS_ERR(h))
> + return PTR_ERR(h);
> +
> +#if !CONFIG_MMU
> + mm->context.end_brk = h->end_brk;
> +#endif
> +
> + ckpt_hdr_put(ctx, h);
> + return ret;
Again ret doesn't seem needed here.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists