[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d86d44a1003221933x50378b37oe9556e1f169ff15a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:33:49 +0800
From: graff yang <graff.yang@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/nommu.c:Dynamic alloc/free percpu area for nommu
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> <graff.yang@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> - return virt_to_page(addr);
>> + return (struct page *)
>> + (virt_to_page(addr)->index) ? : virt_to_page(addr);
>
> Can the extra conditional operator be made subject to CONFIG_SMP?
OK.
Tejun is looking into the up layer percpu code. So I expecting there
is better way
to hook nommu in.
>
>> - return page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(addr));
>> + return page_to_pfn((struct page *)
>> + (virt_to_page(addr)->index) ? : virt_to_page(addr));
>
> Ditto.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> ...
>> +#endif
>
> Can this be put into a separate file? There's rather a lot in mm/nommu.c
> these days.
>
> David
>
--
-Graff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists