| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:52:59 -0400
From: Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10@...il.com>
To: Richard Colquhoun <arfab@...abit.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8187se: fix spacing errors and commenting
format in r8180_93cx6.c
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:58:14PM +0000, Richard Colquhoun wrote:
> From 764502ee11ccd601ee7fb6bc00e2333055b9dd41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Richard Colquhoun <arfab28@...en.(none)>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:32:13 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8187se: fix spacing errors and commenting format in r8180_93cx6.c
> This patch just fixes all of the errors highlighted by the checkpatch.pl script
> Signed-off-by: Richard Colquhoun <arfab@...abit.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_93cx6.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_93cx6.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_93cx6.c
> index 7e4711f..51c59cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_93cx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_93cx6.c
> @@ -22,13 +22,13 @@
>
> void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
> {
> - if(bit)
> + if (bit)
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
> (1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT) | \
> - read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)); //enable EPROM
> + read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)); #enable EPROM
> else
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)\
> - &~(1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT)); //disable EPROM
> + &~(1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT)); #disable EPROM
>
> force_pci_posting(dev);
> udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
> @@ -38,23 +38,23 @@ void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
> void eprom_ck_cycle(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
> - (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
> + (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
> force_pci_posting(dev);
> udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
> - read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) &~ (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
> + read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)&~(1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
> force_pci_posting(dev);
> udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
> }
>
>
> -void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev,short bit)
> +void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
> {
> - if(bit)
> + if (bit)
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, (1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT) | \
> - read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
> + read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
> else
> - write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD)\
> + write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)\
> &~(1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT));
>
> force_pci_posting(dev);
> @@ -66,11 +66,12 @@ short eprom_r(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> short bit;
>
> - bit=(read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT) );
> + bit = (read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT));
> udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
>
> - if(bit) return 1;
> - return 0;
> + if (bit)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
>
> @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for(i=0; i<len; i++){
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> eprom_w(dev, b[i]);
> eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
> }
> @@ -88,50 +89,50 @@ void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
> u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
> {
> struct r8180_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
> - short read_cmd[]={1,1,0};
> + short read_cmd[] = {1, 1, 0};
> short addr_str[8];
> int i;
> int addr_len;
> u32 ret;
>
> - ret=0;
> - //enable EPROM programming
> + ret = 0;
> + #enable EPROM programming
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
> (EPROM_CMD_PROGRAM<<EPROM_CMD_OPERATING_MODE_SHIFT));
> force_pci_posting(dev);
> udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
>
> - if (priv->epromtype==EPROM_93c56){
> - addr_str[7]=addr & 1;
> - addr_str[6]=addr & (1<<1);
> - addr_str[5]=addr & (1<<2);
> - addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<3);
> - addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<4);
> - addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<5);
> - addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<6);
> - addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<7);
> - addr_len=8;
> - }else{
> - addr_str[5]=addr & 1;
> - addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<1);
> - addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<2);
> - addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<3);
> - addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<4);
> - addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<5);
> - addr_len=6;
> + if (priv->epromtype == EPROM_93c56) {
> + addr_str[7] = addr & 1;
> + addr_str[6] = addr & (1<<1);
> + addr_str[5] = addr & (1<<2);
> + addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<3);
> + addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<4);
> + addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<5);
> + addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<6);
> + addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<7);
> + addr_len = 8;
> + } else{
> + addr_str[5] = addr & 1;
> + addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<1);
> + addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<2);
> + addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<3);
> + addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<4);
> + addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<5);
> + addr_len = 6;
> }
> eprom_cs(dev, 1);
> eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
> eprom_send_bits_string(dev, read_cmd, 3);
> eprom_send_bits_string(dev, addr_str, addr_len);
>
> - //keep chip pin D to low state while reading.
> - //I'm unsure if it is necessary, but anyway shouldn't hurt
> + #keep chip pin D to low state while reading.
> + #I'm unsure if it is necessary, but anyway shouldn't hurt
> eprom_w(dev, 0);
>
> - for(i=0;i<16;i++){
> - //eeprom needs a clk cycle between writing opcode&adr
> - //and reading data. (eeprom outs a dummy 0)
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + #eeprom needs a clk cycle between writing opcode&adr
> + #and reading data. (eeprom outs a dummy 0)
> eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
> ret |= (eprom_r(dev)<<(15-i));
> }
> @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
> eprom_cs(dev, 0);
> eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
>
> - //disable EPROM programming
> + #disable EPROM programming
> write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
> (EPROM_CMD_NORMAL<<EPROM_CMD_OPERATING_MODE_SHIFT));
> return ret;
> --
> 1.6.3.3
Looks good besides just one part and I guess that's just me may be: In some cases where you put a # put a space between the # and the comment. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Vikram Dhillon <opensolarisdev@...il.com>
--
Regards,
Vikram Dhillon
There is poetry and there is beauty in real sympathy; but there is more — there is action. The noblest and most powerful form of sympathy is not merely the responsive tear, the echoed sigh, the answering look; it is the embodiment of the sentiment in actual help.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists