linux-kernel - Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y6hii5wq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:35:01 +0100
From:	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
To:	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
Cc:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@...il.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS

>>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk> writes:

Hi,

 Phillip> BTW as a comparison, I have added MTD support to Squashfs
 Phillip> twice in the past, *with* bad block support.  The latest has a
 Phillip> diff patch of ~500 lines, with far less complexity and code
 Phillip> changes necessary.

Could we merge that then please?

Again, what kind of size reduction can we expect from getting rid of the
block layer?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/