lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871vfam00k.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:28:43 +0100
From:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To:	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS

Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk> writes:

>>>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
>  Phillip> BTW as a comparison, I have added MTD support to Squashfs
>  Phillip> twice in the past, *with* bad block support.  The latest has a
>  Phillip> diff patch of ~500 lines, with far less complexity and code
>  Phillip> changes necessary.
>
> Again, what kind of size reduction can we expect from getting rid of
> the block layer?

My size-optimized OpenWRT vmlinux shrank ~170 kB after disabling
CONFIG_BLOCK.  Similarly for the memory consumption.
-- 
Regards,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ