[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871vfam00k.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:28:43 +0100
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk> writes:
>>>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
> Phillip> BTW as a comparison, I have added MTD support to Squashfs
> Phillip> twice in the past, *with* bad block support. The latest has a
> Phillip> diff patch of ~500 lines, with far less complexity and code
> Phillip> changes necessary.
>
> Again, what kind of size reduction can we expect from getting rid of
> the block layer?
My size-optimized OpenWRT vmlinux shrank ~170 kB after disabling
CONFIG_BLOCK. Similarly for the memory consumption.
--
Regards,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists