[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269430347.5109.164.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:32:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "holt@....com" <holt@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86,pat Convert memtype_lock into an rw_lock.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 16:19 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:51 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Well, as you know :) tglx and I are on the road ... I'll try to get to it on Friday before I take off again.
>
> Also I talked to Thomas about this rwlock conversion and he referred to
> RT issues with rwlock. And the best is to avoid this using RCU.
Its not just RT, even for mainline rwlock_t is a massive pain and often
is no better (actually worse) than a spinlock due to the massive
cacheline bouncing it introduces.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists