linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100324092011.GO30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:20:11 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:12:23PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Two patches.
> 
>  The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially
>  confusing.
> 
>  The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch.  It
>  seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other
>  code that walks the super_blocks list.

See #untested in vfs tree...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/