linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100324205004.34d18940@notabene.brown>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:50:04 +1100
From:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:20:11 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:12:23PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > 
> > Two patches.
> > 
> >  The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially
> >  confusing.
> > 
> >  The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch.  It
> >  seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other
> >  code that walks the super_blocks list.
> 
> See #untested in vfs tree...
>

Ahhh, I see I've been beaten to it by 2 days... I should have posted that
patch months ago :-)

Thanks anyway.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/