[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324011714.GA5658@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:17:15 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze
ioctl
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:25:39AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A cc would have been nice :)
>
> Thankfully the subject caught my eye.
>
Well it's not really tux-on-ice's fault, freeze wouldn't work _at all_ via the
ioctl or any other method, we just happened to notice it was broken because
people using tux-on-ice were getting corrupt filesystems after suspend :). Btw,
it may be good to have freezer_sync set to 1 by default, otherwise if an fs
doesnt support freezing it will likely end up corrupted too. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists