[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324162343.GK14800@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:23:43 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:03:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 16:01 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> > What I meant was: perf-kernel puts the guest-name into every sample and
> > perf-userspace accesses /sys/kvm/guest_name/fs/ later to resolve the
> > symbols. I leave the question of how the guest-fs is exposed to the host
> > out of this discussion. We should discuss this seperatly.
>
> I'd much prefer a pid like suggested later, keeps the samples smaller.
>
> But that said, we need guest kernel events like mmap and context
> switches too, otherwise we simply can't make sense of guest userspace
> addresses, we need to know the guest address space layout.
With the filesystem approach all we need is the pid of the guest
process. Then we can access proc/<pid>/maps of the guest and read out the
address space layout, no?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists