linux-kernel - Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:15:55 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To:	Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com>
Cc:	Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:06, Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com> wrote:
>>> None of these perfectly fit, but EINVAL seems the closest.
>>
>> No.  ENOENT is the right value.
>
> Not according to POSIX 2008, which does not explicitly specify this case.

That argumentation is bogus.  You wrote yourself, this situation isn't
(and cannot) be described in POSIX.  For such cases the any error
value is consistent with POSIX.


Again: any value is as good as any other.  The existing value works
and changing it breaks existing code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/