linux-kernel - Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2cc26e41003270450w1a90f9b2j5cbbae9726122b4e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:50:18 +0100
From:	Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
Cc:	Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com> wrote:
>> Not according to POSIX 2008, which does not explicitly specify this case.
>
> That argumentation is bogus.  You wrote yourself, this situation isn't
> (and cannot) be described in POSIX.  For such cases the any error
> value is consistent with POSIX.
>
>
> Again: any value is as good as any other.  The existing value works
> and changing it breaks existing code.

It didn't 'work' for me.
What code would break?

Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/