linux-kernel - Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a36005b51003270505s42b5e69co14d2acbb27dc204a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:05:18 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To:	Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>
Cc:	Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:50, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com> wrote:
> It didn't 'work' for me.

You still don't get it?  No shell provides you with a correct error
message.  There is quite some work involved (reading program header,
finding the interpreter entry, checking the file) to give a meaningful
error message.  Changing the error code alone achieves nothing.


> What code would break?

At the very least the shells in Red Hat releases for many years.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/