[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100325.203313.186750805.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent nested interrupts when the IRQ stack is near
overflowing v2
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
> It makes _all_ interrupts act like IRQF_DISABLED. So it actually fixes
> your issue, by making IRQF_DISABLE a no-op - not because it doesn't exist
> any more, but because the non-IRQF_DISABLED case would not exist any more.
Yep, Peter Z. explained this to me under seperate cover.
Great!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists