[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003251349500.3721@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent nested interrupts when the IRQ stack is near
overflowing v2
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> And I just checked: even the 8250 serial driver doesn't use IRQF_DISABLED
> any more, so doing that shouldn't cause any latency issues (sure, the
> serial driver may interrupt another irq, but another irq can also
> interrupt the serial driver as things stand now, so the original latency
> issue with fast irq handlers doesn't actually work these days _anyway_).
Btw, if we really do decide that everybody is IRQF_DISABLED, that really
should make the whole mask-and-ack issue for the irq controllers go away.
We'd still need it, but only for the very special IDE controller case and
others who _explicitly_ re-enable interrupts. Those would really have to
cause the irq to be masked so that we don't get issues with recursive irqs
of the same kind.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists