[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100328140141.f4a86697.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:01:41 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, david@...es.net,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc2 breaks via82cxxx Host Protected Area
Hi Bart,
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:34:08 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 03:44:34 pm David Miller wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:19:53 +0100
> >
> > > The commit itself may also have a problem but since it was _never_ in
> > > linux-next tree it never saw a wider upstream testing.
> >
> > This is not true Bart.
>
> Uh? I had verified my claims before writing previous mail..
>
> The patch ("via82cxxx: workaround h/w bugs") appeared in Linus'
> tree on 19th January and it was neither in next-20100101 nor in
> next-20100119.. etc.
That commit first appeared in linux-next in next-20100120 as part of
Dave's ide tree. It was merged into Linus' tree on March 5th (commit
4c10c937cc2eb197db565392db91d429eec71176 "Merge
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists