linux-kernel - Re: [watchdog] combine nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100328024650.GA26522@jake.ruivo.org>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:46:50 -0400
From:	Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho <aris@...vo.org>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, gorcunov@...il.com,
	aris@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup

Hi Don,
> +/* deprecated */
> +static int __init nosoftlockup_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	no_watchdog = 1;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("nosoftlockup", nosoftlockup_setup);
> +static int __init nonmi_watchdog_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	no_watchdog = 1;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("nonmi_watchdog", nonmi_watchdog_setup);
didn't you just add nonmi_watchdog parameter? I don't think there's a reason
to keep compatibility here.

the rest of the patch looks fine to me

-- 
Aristeu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/