linux-kernel - [GIT PULL linux-next] break implicit percpu.h -> slab.h dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BAFFBBC.5040402@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:00:44 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL linux-next] break implicit percpu.h -> slab.h dependency

Hello, Stephen.

Can you please pull the following into linux-next?

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git slabh

The tree breaks implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h.  It turned
out that a lot of .c files assumed slab/gfp availability w/o actually
including the respective header, so the conversion ended up modifying
includes on over 4000 files.

I don't expect there to be a lot of conflicts and the ones which
happen should be straight forward to resolve.  Albeit large in volume,
the changes being mostly trivial, I'm hoping to push this into Linus
tree soonish (ie. during this devel cycle), so the tree hopefully will
go away soon.

Please read the following thread for details.

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/965549

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/