lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269897740.15895.82.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:22:20 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...

On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 20:03 +0100, Al Viro wrote: 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:36:45PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > Hi Trond,
> > 
> > When open fails and should return EPERM [1], instead we see an oops
> > [2]. I see this on 2.6.34-rc1 and -rc2 mainline; NFS4 server is
> > mainline 2.6.33.1.
> > 
> > Let me know if you can't reproduce it and I'll provide some analysis
> > from this end.
> 
> Joy...  ERR_PTR(-EPERM) in nd.intent.file, and whoever had called
> lookup_instantiate_filp() hadn't bothered to check the return value.
> 
> OK, I think I see what's going on.  Replace
>                                 lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
>                                 return 1;
> with
>                                 lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
>                                 return state;
> in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:nfs4_open_revalidate() and see if everything works
> properly (or just lose the lookup_instantiate_filp() in there and simply
> return state).
> 

So this raises a point. Originally, the d_revalidate() call was required
to return a boolean 0 or 1. Nowadays it allows the filesystem to return
an error value instead.

Should we therefore rewrite the NFS implementation to propagate errors
like ESTALE (when it means the parent directory is gone), EACCES, EPERM
and EIO instead of the current behaviour of just dropping the dentry and
hence forcing a lookup?

Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ