[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB119F8.7020206@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:22:00 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 5/7] perf probe: Query basic types from debuginfo
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:29PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> +static void convert_variable_type(Dwarf_Die *vr_die,
>> + struct kprobe_trace_arg *targ)
>> +{
>> + Dwarf_Die type;
>> + char buf[16];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (die_get_real_type(vr_die, &type) == NULL)
>> + die("Failed to get a type information of %s.",
>> + dwarf_diename(vr_die));
>> +
>> + ret = die_get_byte_size(&type) * 8;
>> + if (ret) {
>> + /* Check the bitwidth */
>> + if (ret > MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS) {
>> + pr_warning(" Warning: %s exceeds max-bitwidth."
>> + " Cut down to %d bits.\n",
>> + dwarf_diename(&type), MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS);
>> + ret = MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = snprintf(buf, 16, "%c%d",
>> + die_is_signed_type(&type) ? 's' : 'u', ret);
>> + if (ret < 0 || ret >= 16)
>> + die("Failed to convert variable type.");
>> + targ->type = xstrdup(buf);
>
> Question, should we use the equivalent to panic'ing the kernel in the
> userspace bits in tools/?
>
> I tend to see all code there as potentially part of a library, i.e. to
> be callable by some unantecipated new tool or library that would rather
> receive a return value telling it that the operation can't be performed
> for some reason so that it can inform the user instead of having the
> whole tool exit to the command line.
OK, so that you want to see
ret = library_func();
if (ret < 0) /* Something wrong happened */
return ret;
instead of
library_func();
hopefully_executed_next_func();
> It may well be that some specific operation needs lots of resources but
> many other don't, panic'c because the one that requires lots of
> resources can't be performed, bringing down a gui/tui is really nasty.
Hmm, agreed. But I'd like to have some API for storing dying^H^H^H^H^Herror
message. (maybe can we use setjump/longjump approach - like try/cache - for die()?)
Thank you,
>
> Perhaps the answer will be the same as for when people added panic calls
> in the kernel in the past, "you're screwed up anyway if that happens",
> but it just feels wrong :-\
>
> In the DWARF bits it has even the added twist namespace collapse with
> DIE 8-)
>
> - Arnaldo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists