[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB1EBD4.9030707@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:17:24 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] input: update gfp/slab.h includes
Hello,
On 03/30/2010 12:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/sysrq.c b/drivers/char/sysrq.c
>> index 532c56c..593562d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/sysrq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/sysrq.c
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>> #include <linux/oom.h>
>> #include <linux/input.h>
>> -#include <linux/gfp.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
>
> This patch does not apply to the input tree. That tree does not have the
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> line (your tree (slabh) adds that later in the linux-next cycle).
Ah, I see. sysrq.c's requirement changed between mainline and
linux-next. I'll update slabh tree such that it includes slab.h from
there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists