linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/17] input: update gfp/slab.h includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:29:19 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] input: update gfp/slab.h includes

Hello, again.

On 03/30/2010 09:17 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ah, I see.  sysrq.c's requirement changed between mainline and
> linux-next.  I'll update slabh tree such that it includes slab.h from
> there.

slabh updated such that...

* kmemcheck fix patch is placed before the patch to break implicit
  slab.h inclusion.

* sysrq.c now includes slab.h instead of gfp.h.

* Updated against the current mainline
  9623e5a23724d09283c238960946ec6f65733afe.  Conversion script was run
  again and outputs are compared.  No new dependency appeared since
  the last round.

So, it should now be safe to ignore this patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/