lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:44:04 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slabh tree with the percpu tree

On 03/30/2010 03:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the slabh tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/percpu.h between commit
> 10fad5e46f6c7bdfb01b1a012380a38e3c6ab346 ("percpu, module: implement and
> use is_kernel/module_percpu_address()") from the percpu tree and commit
> d103d3b3e8512312b5254950035366d4422a479a ("percpu: don't implicitly
> include slab.h from percpu.h") from the slabh tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks.  I'll soon push the stuff in percpu#for-next to mainline
(they're fixes) and merge it into slabh.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ