linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lockdep fix incorrect percpu usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BB2B6C4.8090803@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:43:16 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep fix incorrect percpu usage

On 03/31/2010 12:05 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> I see. These patches are "on their way" to mainline, so it's better not to
> create conflicts. So the lockdep patch should only be applied to -stable, but
> separate module.c patch should apply to both -stable and mainline. Am I
> correct ?

I'll push proper fixes to mainline in a few days.  For -stable, yeah,
probably.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/