[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100331055306.GC4837@datarespons.se>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:53:06 +0200
From: Anders Darander <anders.darander@...arespons.se>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow MACB to connect to a higher addresses PHY.
Hi Grant,
Thanks for the feedback!
* Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> [100330 16:42]:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Anders Darander
> <anders.darander@...il.com> wrote:
> > Using the Atmel MACB together with an integrated switch, can make only port 1
> > work. This is caused by macb_mii_probe trying to attach the MAC to the first
> > PHY, which often is on one of the external ports.
> >
> > E.g. the Micrel KSZ8873 connects to the MAC on port 3, thus phy_addr should be
> > set to 3.
> I understand what you are trying to do, but this is the wrong way to
> go about it. Hard coding it into Kconfig breaks multiplatform
> kernels. Besides, systems may have more than one physical MDIO bus.
> This patch would make CONFIG_SWITCHING_PHY_ADDR the only address
> accessible on all MDIO busses.
True, it would at least make all addresses < CONFIG_SWITCHING_PHY_ADDR
non-accessible.
We developed the patch to solve this problem on a 2.6.29-kernel, in
which the loop in question is directly in the macb_mii_probe() in the
macb.c, thus, the original patch is at least a _little_ bit less ugly...
> Nak.
I fully agree on the nak; I completely forgot that the functions in
phy_devices should be used from more interfaces than only the macb.
> The right thing to do is to add a runtime configuration option (ie.
> kernel parameter or platform data) to the mac driver to specify
> exactly which PHY address it is supposed to use.
I'll see if I can get some time to do such a thing. Unfortunately, it'll
probably have to be dealt with on my sparetime (the customer is quite
unlikely to let me work on that).
One question, if I add such an kernel parameter, would it be OK to
implement something like this in the macb-driver:
if parameter == SOME_DEFAULT
phydev = phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus);
else
phydev = bp->mii_bus->phy_map[parameter];
I.e. if the parameter is set to some default value, the old behaviour is
retained, otherwise the specified parameter is used for the phy_addr?
I'd appreciate your input on such a design.
Best regards,
Anders Darander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists