linux-kernel - Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100331151620.GA1893@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:16:20 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, trenn@...e.de,
	linux@...inikbrodowski.net, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:08:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
 > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
 > Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:42:41PM -0700
 > 
 > > On 03/30/2010 08:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > > > 
 > > > I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the
 > > > x86 tree, btw.  They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I
 > > > suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard.
 > > > 
 > > 
 > > I would agree with that.  I'll try to get them in tomorrow.
 > 
 > Cool. I'll have updated versions of the patches soon - just don't take
 > those yet.

fine, I'll drop these from the cpufreq git tree later.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/