[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003311730.31379.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:30:31 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jblunck@...e.de,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT, RFC] Killing the Big Kernel Lock II
On Monday 29 March 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > The patch looks correct, but I probably wouldn't bother with the rename,
> > > > and simply drop the BKL in the caller.
> > >
> > > I think a rename is better, I take compile errors over subtle
> > > breakage any day.
> >
> > ok, fine with me.
>
> I updated the git tree removing the unneeded serial change. Feel free to pull.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc-2.6.git usb-bkl
Looks good to me. I guess it makes sense to merge this through Greg's USB
tree. AFAICT the only prerequisite to this series is to have CONFIG_BKL
enabled in Kconfig. Shall we add a that to 2.6.34 as 'def_bool y' for
preparation so we can queue up patches like this in maintainer trees?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists