[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adazl1ogn0o.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:11:03 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jblunck@...e.de,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT, RFC] Killing the Big Kernel Lock
Hi Arnd,
Looking at your tree, I see you have commit 753dd249 ("perf_event: use
nonseekable_open") that does:
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -2515,6 +2515,8 @@ static int perf_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on)
> }
>
> static const struct file_operations perf_fops = {
> + .open = nonseekable_open,
> + .llseek = no_llseek,
> .release = perf_release,
> .read = perf_read,
> .poll = perf_poll,
But if I understand this correctly, the assignment to .open is at best
useless -- these file_operations are only used via anon_inode_getfd()
and so there is no possible path that can call the .open method. Or am
I missing something?
(The same applies to the kvm_main.c changes too)
--
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists