[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adaeij0gj3a.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:35:53 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: "lkml\, " <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Ideal Adaptive Spinning Conditions
> I'm looking at some adaptive spinning with futexes as a way to help
> reduce the dependence on sched_yield() to implement userspace
> spinlocks. Chris, I included you in the CC after reading your comments
> regarding sched_yield() at kernel summit and I thought you might be
> interested.
I think you may have the wrong Chris. Chris Wright wasn't at the most
recent kernel summit and I do have a vague recollection of Chris Mason
mentioning that Oracle developers found that sched_yield() performed
better than futexes + kernel scheduling.
--
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists