[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100406175311.11e5d3a8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:53:11 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
John Cooper <john.cooper@...rd-harmonic.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6][RFC] futex: FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptive
spinning
> That works for the uncontended case. For the contended case, the waiter
> and the owner have to go into the kernel and back out to transfer
> ownership.
If you insist on doing it that way yes, but knowing the lock owner is
likely to be away for a while also lets you do things like punt work
either by picking another work package in the meantime, or by queueing
the work you can't do on a list the pre-empted lock owner will review
before dropping the lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists