[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100406095633.49ec957a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:56:33 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rvinyard@...nmsu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:35:35 +0200 Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Tue, 06 April 2010 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:56:35 +0200 Bruno Prémont wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:40:06 +0200 Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [ adding Bruno to CC ]
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > HID_PICOLCD should depend on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, otherwise the
> > > > > build fails when HID_PICOLCD=y and LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=m:
> > > > >
> > > > > hid-picolcd.c:(.text+0x84523f): undefined reference to `lcd_device_unregister'
> > > > > hid-picolcd.c:(.text+0x8478ab): undefined reference to `lcd_device_register'
> > > > > hid-picolcd.c:(.text+0x84c15f): undefined reference to `lcd_device_unregister'
> > >
> > > That is weird, the
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE) || defined(CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE_MODULE)
> > > feature support code
> > > #else
> > > empty stubs
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > blocks should have prevented LCD_CLASS support from being built if it
> > > was not enabled in configuration.
> > >
> > > Do you have the .config matching your build?
> >
> > Yes, it's attached.
>
> Thanks, here is the extract (only the pertinent items):
> CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=m
> CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y
> CONFIG_HID_PICOLCD=y
>
> It triggers the issue by having PicoLCD built-in while one of the
> optional dependencies as a module.
Yes, basically what the patch description said.
> Any idea of how this can be solved with kbuild in order to keep the
> dependencies optional?
>
> Something that would satisfy the following pseudocode:
> if CONFIG_HID_PICOLCD == y
> assert(CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE != m)
>
If you don't want the kconfig machinery to do that (it appears that you don't),
then I guess that you'll need to expand the source code to handle
CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=y and CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=m differently.
Or only handle them differently if HID_PICOLCD=y. :(
>
> One of my attempts did end up with a circular loop with regard to FB
> (some of the FB drivers did select INPUT)?
(not that I can find)
CONFIG_VT does select INPUT
and CONFIG_DRM_I915 does
select INPUT if ACPI
> I had something like:
>
> config HID_PICOLCD
> tristate ...
>
> config HID_PICOLCD_FB
> bool ...
> depends on HID_PICOLCD
> select FB
> select FB_...
>
> ...
>
> Then in the code I checked for CONFIG_HID_PICOLCD_FB instead of
> (CONFIG_FB or CONFIG_FB_MODULE).
---
~Randy
(re)read Documentation/ManagementStyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists