[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100406165720.GA17916@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:57:20 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
To: ext Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
"Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@...com>,
"me@...ipebalbi.com" <me@...ipebalbi.com>,
"'kishore kadiyala'" <kishorek.kadiyala@...il.com>,
"'Vimal Singh'" <vimal.newwork@...il.com>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lavinen Jarkko (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
peformance.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:55:03PM +0200, ext Nishanth Menon wrote:
>some reasons why i love switch statements ;) since I dont expect other
>than precisely 4 and 8 (do we expect 5,6,7 - i might be wrong).. but if
>it is so, wont the following be better?
>
>switch (mmc_slot(host).wires)
>{
>case 8:
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> /* fall thru*/
>case 4:
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> break;
>default:
> WARN("bad width");
>}
I like that, but I remember Madhu (or someone else) saying he thinks
it's less readable this way. Go figure...
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists