[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <w2ocd73a99e1004061427t322f8d4cmecd708ad16580f00@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:27:55 +0200
From: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
To: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning PLLs
off
hi Anders,
> From: Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>
>
> AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag
> to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation
> of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
> Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
During suspend we set the MULA and MULB bits to 0 to disable the
PLL's. When disabled, the PLLs will never "lock".
Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>
Russell: This is patch 5975/1 in the patch-system.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists