[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100412191006.GJ3048@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:10:07 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning
PLLs off
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
> hi Anders,
>
> > From: Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>
> >
> > AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag
> > to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation
> > of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
> > Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>
> During suspend we set the MULA and MULB bits to 0 to disable the
> PLL's. When disabled, the PLLs will never "lock".
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>
>
>
> Russell: This is patch 5975/1 in the patch-system.
Thanks; I see your ack has been added to that patch. Should I assume that
this is for -rc rather than -devel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists