linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning PLLs off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:22:32 +0200
From:	Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning PLLs 
	off

hi Russell,

>> > AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag
>> > to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation
>> > of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
>> > Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
>> > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>>    Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>
>>
>>
> Thanks; I see your ack has been added to that patch.  Should I assume that
> this is for -rc rather than -devel?

If it can still be merged for -rc, that would be great.
Otherwise the -devel branch is ok.


Regards,
  Andrew Victor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/