linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100406.163951.115014932.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, efault@....de,
	fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI

From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200

> This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem
> that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the
> existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage.

Ok, two patches coming.

One which adds the sparc64 irqflags.h methods.

And one which annotates the ftrace functions, as needed.

With this I have the function tracer working.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/