[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270602790.19685.15603.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:13:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, acme@...hat.com,
paulus@...ba.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] kernel: local_irq_{save,restore}_nmi()
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,14 @@ void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off);
>
> +void trace_hardirqs_off_no_nmi(void)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
Should we do this for all archs? I can imagine a lot of warning reports
coming in the near future. And they will be passing it towards me.
-- Steve
> + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace())
> + start_critical_timing(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off_no_nmi);
> +
> void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long caller_addr)
> {
> if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace())
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists