[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100410015711.GH11130@hexapodia.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:57:11 -0700
From: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
Cc: guenter.roeck@...csson.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reserve legacy VGA MMIO area for x86_64 as well
as x86_32
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:48:31PM -0700, Yinghai wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 06:43 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:10:49PM -0700, Yinghai wrote:
> >> in addition to -v2 patch
> >>
> >> please apply this patch too
> >>
> >> also please boot with "debug" in boot command line.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Yinghai
> >>
> >> [PATCH] x86,acpi: use request_resource instead of instead of insert_resource
> >>
> >> So make pci root resouce from _CRS honor the one We reserve in e820 below 1M
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> >> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ setup_resource(struct acpi_resource *acp
> >> return AE_OK;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - conflict = insert_resource_conflict(root, res);
> >> + conflict = request_resource_conflict(root, res);
> >> if (conflict) {
> >> dev_err(&info->bridge->dev,
> >> "address space collision: host bridge window %pR "
> >
> > That works. dmesg.gz attached (I'm pretty sure I'm skating close to
> > vger's size limit without gz). "debug" didn't seem to make much
> > difference?
>
> [ 0.636805] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> [ 0.654025] pci_root PNP0A03:00: address space collision: host bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0cf7] conflicts with dma1 [io 0x0000-0x001f]
> [ 0.654370] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [io 0x0d00-0xffff]
> [ 0.654586] pci_root PNP0A03:00: address space collision: host bridge window [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff] conflicts with reserved [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff]
> [ 0.654933] pci_root PNP0A03:00: address space collision: host bridge window [mem 0x000c0000-0x000effff] conflicts with reserved [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff]
> [ 0.655002] pci_root PNP0A03:00: address space collision: host bridge window [mem 0x000f0000-0x000fffff] conflicts with reserved [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff]
> [ 0.655367] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xf0000000-0xfebfffff]
> [ 0.655706] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
> [ 0.656003] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xff980800-0xff980bff]
> [ 0.656360] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xff97c000-0xff97ffff]
> [ 0.657002] pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xfed20000-0xfed9ffff]
>
> still not optimal.
Well, thanks for looking at it; if there are any more patches I can try,
let me know (but I may not get to it until Monday morning, since I can't
reliably reboot this machine remotely).
Is this a BIOS error? I am currently running A04; there's an A10
available, but I didn't want to perturb the situation during the
debugging cycle without guidance.
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists