lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC09032.1060004@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date:	Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:50:26 +0900
From:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, h.mitake@...il.com,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "nested" field to event of lock_release

On 04/10/10 22:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
 > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 19:41 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
 >> State machine of perf lock requires "nested" field of lock_release(),
 >> so this patch adds it to event.
 >>
 >> Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake<mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
 >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
 >> Cc: Paul Mackerras<paulus@...ba.org>
 >> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo<acme@...hat.com>
 >> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker<fweisbec@...il.com>
 >
 > The nested flag only indicates if it could be nested, not if it was
 > actually nested. So no, this doesn't make any sense at all.
 >
 > (in fact, pretty much every lock_release out there has nested=1)
 >

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood.
When looked at rwlock_release(), I judged that nested is required,
because double or more read_lock() is allowed.

Thanks for your correction :)
        Hitoshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ