linux-kernel - Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BC1E4A4.1070103@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:00 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, npiggin@...e.de,
	mingo@...e.hu, Ruald Andreae <ruald.a@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Olly Betts <olly@...vex.com>,
	martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing

On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleen<andi@...stfloor.org>  wrote:
>    
>> Ben Gamari<bgamari.foss@...il.com>  writes:
>> ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard
>>
>>      
> I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better. Unfortunately,
> the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load.
>
>    

btrfs is known to perform poorly under fsync.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/