lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bc1fa59.c5c2f10a.776d.ffffcd91@mx.google.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, npiggin@...e.de,
	mingo@...e.hu, Ruald Andreae <ruald.a@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Olly Betts <olly@...vex.com>,
	martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:00 +0300, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleen<andi@...stfloor.org>  wrote:
> >    
> >> Ben Gamari<bgamari.foss@...il.com>  writes:
> >> ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard
> >>
> >>      
> > I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better. Unfortunately,
> > the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load.
> >
> 
> btrfs is known to perform poorly under fsync.
> 
Has the reason for this been identified? Judging from the nature of metadata
loads, it would seem that it should be substantially easier to implement
fsync() efficiently.

- Ben

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ