[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100417170808.GE32634@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:08 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
arjan@...radead.org, csadler@...gle.com, ranjitm@...gle.com,
kenchen@...gle.com, dawnchen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:51:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote:
> > As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it
> > would like to share. I have finally gotten around to porting it to
> > v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is provided in the following
> > messages for your review. I realize that when we first discussed this
> > idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for
> > your suggestions. I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them.
>
> .33 is way too old to submit patches against.
But it's not too old for review purposes; as Salman said, they were
sent to LKML for comments and review. I think it's well understood
that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be
submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc
kernel.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists