[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100417105721.63d48577@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:57:21 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: tytso@....edu
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, csadler@...gle.com,
ranjitm@...gle.com, kenchen@...gle.com, dawnchen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:08 -0400
tytso@....edu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:51:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote:
> > > As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation
> > > that it would like to share. I have finally gotten around to
> > > porting it to v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is
> > > provided in the following messages for your review. I realize
> > > that when we first discussed this idea, a lot of ideas were
> > > presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for your suggestions. I
> > > haven't gotten around to implementing any of them.
> >
> > .33 is way too old to submit patches against.
>
> But it's not too old for review purposes; as Salman said, they were
> sent to LKML for comments and review. I think it's well understood
> that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be
> submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc
> kernel.
s/submitted/refreshed/ ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists