[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271533888.1674.486.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:51:28 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	tytso@....edu
Cc:	Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...radead.org, csadler@...gle.com, ranjitm@...gle.com,
	kenchen@...gle.com, dawnchen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:08 -0400, tytso@....edu wrote:
> I think it's well understood
> that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be
> submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc
> kernel. 
No, they need to be in the relevant subsystem tree by then, patch
submissions to subsystem trees right before the merge window opens are
bound to get delayed another cycle.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
